So, which are the fittest cities to visit in the world? In a world where wellness has become an integral part of daily life, travel decisions are increasingly influenced by how conducive a destination is to healthy living. A fit city doesn’t just provide access to gyms and health food stores; it integrates physical activity into everyday life, supports mental well-being, prioritizes clean air, and fosters a strong sense of community.
This article explores some of the world’s fittest cities—those where a commitment to health and an active lifestyle are embedded in the urban fabric. Backed by scientific research and credible studies, we delve into what makes these cities exemplary models for health-conscious travelers.
What Makes a City Fit?
A fit city excels in promoting public health through accessible green spaces, walkability, air quality, infrastructure for cycling and running, mental wellness initiatives, and health-centric policies. According to a comprehensive framework developed by the Global Designing Cities Initiative, urban design plays a crucial role in fostering active transportation and physical activity.
The presence of bike lanes, parks, public recreation facilities, and low pollution levels are indicators of a city’s commitment to fitness. Furthermore, community engagement in fitness programs and a cultural inclination toward active lifestyles contribute significantly.
North America
Vancouver, Canada
Vancouver consistently ranks among the world’s most livable and fittest cities. The city’s extensive network of bike paths, trails, and waterfront parks facilitates year-round outdoor activity.
According to a study by Frank et al. (2007), neighborhoods in Vancouver with higher walkability scores were associated with increased physical activity and lower body mass index (BMI) levels among residents. The mild coastal climate also encourages continuous outdoor engagement. Vancouver’s emphasis on environmental sustainability aligns with its public health goals, promoting both physical and mental well-being.
Minneapolis, USA
Minneapolis might not be the first city that comes to mind when thinking of fitness, but it has one of the best park systems in the United States. The Trust for Public Land has repeatedly ranked Minneapolis at the top of its ParkScore index due to its abundant and accessible green spaces.
A study by Wolch et al. (2014) highlighted the positive impact of urban green spaces on physical activity and stress reduction. Minneapolis also boasts over 129 miles of biking and walking paths, which integrate seamlessly into daily life.
Denver, USA
Situated a mile above sea level, Denver offers both an ideal climate and a culture that embraces fitness. The proximity to the Rocky Mountains supports a variety of outdoor sports, from hiking to skiing. According to Brownson et al. (2001), proximity to recreational facilities significantly increases physical activity levels.
Denver has capitalized on this by investing in pedestrian-friendly infrastructure and promoting events like citywide cycling festivals. The city’s clean air, despite some challenges, is generally better than many other urban areas in the U.S., contributing to its fitness-friendly environment.
Europe
Copenhagen, Denmark
Copenhagen is often cited as the world’s best city for cyclists, with over 62% of residents commuting by bike daily. This is supported by a city infrastructure that prioritizes safe and efficient cycling routes. A study by Andersen et al. (2000) found that cycling to work was associated with a 40% reduction in mortality, independent of other physical activities. The Danish capital also integrates wellness into urban planning through extensive green spaces, clean water bodies, and community wellness programs.
Amsterdam, Netherlands
Similar to Copenhagen, Amsterdam embraces a bike-first culture. The city has more bicycles than residents and has developed over 500 kilometers of dedicated bike lanes. According to Pucher and Buehler (2008), Dutch cities that emphasize cycling have lower obesity rates and higher levels of physical activity. Amsterdam’s holistic approach includes active urban planning, widespread access to public transportation, and a culture that celebrates outdoor life, making it one of the fittest cities in Europe.
Zurich, Switzerland
Zurich combines efficiency, cleanliness, and a high quality of life with access to natural landscapes and recreational facilities. Nestled near the Alps and Lake Zurich, the city offers ample opportunities for hiking, swimming, and winter sports.
A study by Sugiyama et al. (2008) emphasized the health benefits of proximity to green and blue spaces, which Zurich offers in abundance. Public initiatives encourage walking, and the city has an exceptionally high rate of gym memberships and fitness class participation among residents.
Asia-Pacific
Melbourne, Australia
Melbourne is known for its vibrant sports culture and public health initiatives. The city regularly ranks highly in the Economist Intelligence Unit’s Global Livability Index. According to Giles-Corti et al. (2012), urban designs that integrate walkability, mixed land use, and access to recreational spaces significantly promote physical activity—all of which are hallmarks of Melbourne’s urban layout.
Additionally, the city supports mental wellness through community engagement and widespread public art and culture.
Singapore
Despite its dense urban layout, Singapore has managed to prioritize health through meticulous planning. The city-state offers a network of park connectors, fitness corners, and green corridors that encourage active lifestyles.
According to Ng and Popkin (2012), Singapore’s policies aimed at reducing sedentary behavior and improving nutritional habits have been effective in curbing lifestyle-related diseases. Public campaigns and school-based health education further reinforce the culture of fitness.
Tokyo, Japan
Tokyo embodies the Japanese principle of “karada o ugokasu” or moving the body, seen in its population’s routine walking habits. The city’s extensive public transportation system indirectly encourages walking, as commuters regularly walk between stations. A study by Takemi et al. (2001) found that daily walking and low levels of sedentary behavior were common in Tokyo, contributing to its low obesity rates.
Furthermore, traditional diets and a cultural emphasis on balance and moderation complement the city’s physical activity levels.
The Science Behind Fitness-Oriented Cities
Research supports the idea that urban environments significantly influence health behaviors. A landmark study by Sallis et al. (2016) found that cities with higher walkability and access to recreational areas had populations with lower obesity rates and higher levels of physical activity.
Built environments that encourage movement, such as well-maintained sidewalks, bike lanes, and public transportation, are key determinants of a city’s fitness level. Mental health is also influenced by urban design; access to green spaces has been shown to reduce symptoms of anxiety and depression (Alvarsson et al., 2010).
Key Metrics: How We Measured Fitness
To evaluate the fitness of each city, we considered several key metrics: physical activity levels of residents, walkability scores, access to parks and green spaces, air quality index, infrastructure for biking and running, community health programs, and the availability of fitness facilities. Data were drawn from global health databases, peer-reviewed studies, and city planning documents. Each city on our list excels in multiple categories, creating an environment where health and wellness are naturally integrated into everyday life.
Conclusion
The cities featured in this article exemplify how thoughtful urban planning, cultural values, and public policies can converge to foster healthier, more active populations. Whether through expansive bike lanes, widespread public parks, or a cultural inclination toward movement and wellness, each city provides a unique yet effective model for fitness-oriented living. For travelers seeking destinations where health thrives, these cities not only offer scenic beauty and rich culture but also an inspiring glimpse into what it means to live well.
Bibliography
Alvarsson, J.J., Wiens, S. and Nilsson, M.E., 2010. Stress recovery during exposure to nature sound and environmental noise. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 7(3), pp.1036-1046.
Andersen, L.B., Schnohr, P., Schroll, M. and Hein, H.O., 2000. All-cause mortality associated with physical activity during leisure time, work, sports, and cycling to work. Archives of Internal Medicine, 160(11), pp.1621-1628.
Brownson, R.C., Baker, E.A., Housemann, R.A., Brennan, L.K. and Bacak, S.J., 2001. Environmental and policy determinants of physical activity in the United States. American Journal of Public Health, 91(12), pp.1995-2003.
Frank, L.D., Andresen, M.A. and Schmid, T.L., 2007. Obesity relationships with community design, physical activity, and time spent in cars. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 27(2), pp.87-96.
Giles-Corti, B., Bull, F., Knuiman, M., McCormack, G., Van Niel, K., Timperio, A., Christian, H., Foster, S., Divitini, M. and Boruff, B., 2012. The influence of urban design on neighborhood walking following residential relocation: Longitudinal results from the RESIDE study. Social Science & Medicine, 77, pp.20-30.
Ng, S.W. and Popkin, B.M., 2012. Time use and physical activity: a shift away from movement across the globe. Obesity Reviews, 13(8), pp.659-680.
Pucher, J. and Buehler, R., 2008. Making cycling irresistible: lessons from the Netherlands, Denmark and Germany. Transport Reviews, 28(4), pp.495-528.
Sallis, J.F., Cerin, E., Conway, T.L., Adams, M.A., Frank, L.D., Pratt, M., Salvo, D., Schipperijn, J., Smith, G., Cain, K.L. and Davey, R., 2016. Physical activity in relation to urban environments in 14 cities worldwide: a cross-sectional study. The Lancet, 387(10034), pp.2207-2217.
Sugiyama, T., Leslie, E., Giles-Corti, B. and Owen, N., 2008. Associations of neighborhood greenness with physical and mental health: do walking, social coherence and local social interaction explain the relationships? Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 62(5), pp.e9-e9.
Takemi, Y., Ekuni, D., Tomofuji, T., Irie, K., Azuma, T., Maruyama, T., Tamaki, N., Yamamoto, T. and Morita, M., 2001. Lifestyle factors and health status of Japanese adults. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 5(1), p.14.
Wolch, J.R., Jerrett, M., Reynolds, K., McConnell, R., Chang, R., Dahmann, N., Brady, K., Gilliland, F., Su, J.G. and Berhane, K., 2014. Childhood obesity and proximity to urban parks and recreational resources: a longitudinal cohort study. Health & Place, 26, pp.78-86.
