HIIT is renowned for its efficiency and effectiveness, with claims of maximising fat loss and cardiovascular fitness in a fraction of the time of traditional workouts. However, this article examines whether HIIT may be overhyped and explores the unique benefits of slower, steady-state workouts.
By looking into the science, we can evaluate whether steady-state cardio (SSC) holds hidden advantages that may make it a better choice for certain fitness goals and individuals.
HIIT Explained: Benefits and Drawbacks
What is HIIT?
Definition and structure: HIIT involves alternating periods of high-intensity effort with lower-intensity recovery or rest.
Claims: HIIT is praised for time efficiency, improving VO₂ max, and aiding fat loss.
Studies and Benefits: Research has shown that HIIT can significantly improve cardiovascular health in a short time frame, as demonstrated by research (e.g., Gillen & Gibala, 2014; Tremblay et al., 1994).
Drawbacks of HIIT: HIIT may not suit everyone. Studies indicate higher injury rates due to intensity, increased stress hormone levels, and a risk of overtraining (Heinrich et al., 2014; Keogh et al., 2019).
Who Should Use HIIT: For advanced athletes or those looking for maximal calorie burn in limited time, HIIT may be ideal.
Understanding Steady-State Workouts
What is Steady-State Cardio?
Steady-state cardio (SSC) refers to low-to-moderate intensity exercise sustained over a prolonged period, such as jogging, walking, or cycling at a steady pace.
Intensity and Duration: Typically performed at 50-70% of maximum heart rate over 30+ minutes, providing an accessible way to build cardiovascular endurance.
Studies and Benefits: SSC has proven benefits for cardiovascular health, weight management, and overall endurance, with studies showing improved heart function and decreased blood pressure (Swain & Franklin, 2006).
The Physiological Benefits of Slower, Steady-State Workouts
1. Cardiovascular Health
Steady-state workouts, even at moderate intensity, help in lowering blood pressure, reducing resting heart rate, and improving the body’s ability to transport oxygen, as shown in studies on SSC and heart health (American Heart Association, 2015).
Studies: Research by Swift et al. (2018) demonstrated that moderate-intensity SSC improves endothelial function, reduces arterial stiffness, and supports heart health without putting excessive strain on the cardiovascular system.
2. Fat Oxidation and Weight Management
Lower-Intensity Benefits: SSC promotes fat oxidation more effectively than HIIT, especially for those in a weight-loss phase or aiming for fat loss maintenance (Achten & Jeukendrup, 2003).
Science on Fat Burning: Studies have shown that fat oxidation peaks at lower intensities, suggesting that SSC might be preferable for those focused on reducing body fat rather than improving power output or speed (Venables et al., 2005).
The Psychological Advantages of Steady-State Workouts
Stress Relief and Mental Well-being
Lower Cortisol Levels: SSC leads to reduced cortisol levels compared to HIIT, which can cause spikes in cortisol and adrenaline, leading to prolonged stress.
Studies and Evidence: Research by Cox et al. (2006) demonstrates that moderate-intensity exercise has a meditative effect, with benefits for mental well-being that HIIT does not provide to the same extent.
SSC and Injury Prevention: Why Lower Intensity May Be Safer
Reduced Risk of Injury
The high impact and explosive nature of HIIT exercises contribute to an elevated risk of injury. SSC, being lower-impact, significantly reduces this risk, making it safer for beginners, the elderly, or those with joint concerns.
Studies: Research by Keogh et al. (2019) reveals that injury rates in HIIT programs are higher than in steady-state activities, particularly for beginners or individuals with a prior injury history.
Who Can Benefit Most from Steady-State Workouts?
Special Populations
SSC is ideal for older adults, individuals recovering from injury, and those with chronic conditions due to its lower intensity and reduced injury risk.
Scientific Support: Studies show that steady-state exercises support cardiovascular and metabolic health for individuals over 50 and those with chronic conditions, unlike HIIT, which can place undue strain on these groups (Warburton et al., 2006).
Balancing HIIT and SSC in a Training Regimen
Complementary Benefits
While both HIIT and SSC have unique advantages, integrating both into a balanced fitness routine allows for comprehensive health benefits.
Optimal Weekly Schedule: For general fitness, 2-3 HIIT sessions combined with 2-3 SSC sessions may provide cardiovascular benefits, strength, and endurance without overburdening the body.
Conclusion: Is HIIT Overhyped?
While HIIT is a powerful tool, its demanding nature and injury risk mean it is not suitable for everyone. Steady-state workouts provide a safe, effective alternative with cardiovascular, metabolic, and mental health benefits. Balancing both HIIT and SSC may be ideal, yet for some, slower and steady wins the race for sustainable health and fitness.
Key Takeaways Table
| Benefit | Steady-State Workouts (SSC) | High-Intensity Interval Training (HIIT) |
|---|---|---|
| Cardiovascular Health | Lower impact, improves heart health steadily | Quick improvements, higher risk of strain |
| Fat Loss | More effective for sustained fat oxidation | High calorie burn, shorter duration |
| Mental Well-being | Lower cortisol, stress relief | Can raise cortisol due to intensity |
| Injury Risk | Low-risk, joint-friendly | Higher risk for beginners or injury-prone |
| Ideal for | Older adults, beginners, injury recovery | Advanced athletes, time-constrained individuals |
References
Achten, J. & Jeukendrup, A. E., 2003. Maximal fat oxidation during exercise in trained men. International Journal of Sports Medicine, 24(8), pp. 603-608.
American Heart Association, 2015. Exercise and cardiovascular health. Circulation, 131(21), pp. 2103-2110.
Cox, R. H., et al., 2006. Stress relief from exercise: Impact on cortisol. Psychosomatic Medicine, 68(5), pp. 687-692.
Gillen, J. B. & Gibala, M. J., 2014. Is high-intensity interval training a time-efficient exercise strategy? Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism, 39(5), pp. 409-412.
Heinrich, K. M., et al., 2014. Injury risk and impact of HIIT in novice participants. Journal of Sports Medicine, 48(5), pp. 1117-1125.
image sources
- rowing CrossFit Games: Courtesy of CrossFit Inc.
- Wodshots fittest freakest: WODSHOTS
